PERLINDUNGAN HAK HADHANAH PASCA PERCERAIAN DALAMPERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM: ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILANAGAMA SUKOHARJO Nomor 1053/Pdt.G/2014/PA.Skh
Keywords:
hadhanah, child protection, best interests for children, divorce, religious justiceAbstract
The revocation of hadhanah claims in divorce cases is legal issues that have implications not only on procedural aspects, but also for the protection of children's rights after divorce. This study aims to analyze the concept of hadhanah from the perspective of Islamic law and positive Indonesian law, examining the judge's legal considerations in the Sukoharjo Religious Court Decision Number 1053/Pdt.G/2014/PA. Skh, as well as analyzing the juridical implications of the revocation of hadhanah claims on the protection of children's rights. This research is a normative legal research with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The legal material used consists of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal material that is analyzed qualitatively through a descriptive-analysis method. The results of the study show that the concept of hadhanah in Islamic law is an obligation of parents that is oriented towards the benefit of the child (maṣlaḥah al-maḥḍūn) and the protection of offspring (ḥifẓ al-nasl), which is in line with the provisions of the Marriage Law, the Drafting of Islamic Law, and the Child Protection Law which prioritizes the principle of the best interests of the child. The judge's consideration in the Decision of the Sukoharjo Religious Court Number 1053/Pdt.G/2014/PA. Skh is procedurally in accordance with the principle of disposition in the civil procedure law because the revocation of the lawsuit is carried out before the defendant gives an answer. However, the revocation of hadhanah claims results in the absence of a determination regarding the right to custody and fulfillment of children's rights, which has the potential to create legal uncertainty and does not fully reflect substantive protection of the best interests of the child. This study concludes that the settlement of family cases requires harmonization between the principle of disposition in civil procedure law and the principle of child protection so that court decisions not only guarantee procedural law certainty, but also realize substantive justice for children as legal subjects who must obtain optimal protection
Downloads
References
Agustina, F. “Fulfilling Children’s Rights Through Post-Divorce Relationships: An Investigation from Bima.” Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 2023. https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/syariah/Ahwal.
Aji, Habib Usman, and Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari. “Hak Hadanah Anak Yang Belum Tamyiz Pasca Terjadi.” Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari, 2025.
Ammar, D, A Halim, and H Maryani. “The Implementation of Child Custody (Hadhanah ) After Dissolution of Marriage Due to Divorce.” International E-Research Journal, 2021. http://www.eresearchjournal.com.
Auda, Jasser. “Maqasid Al-Shariah As Philosopy.” The International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2008, 1–348.
Child, Convention on the Rights of the, and Adopted. The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1990). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.1989.tb00500.x.
Dihni, Dewi Salamatut. “Hadhanah Dan Perwalian Anak Dalam Hukum Indonesia: Analisis UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 Dan KHI.” Al-Hasani: Journal of Islamic Studies 2, no. 1 (2025): 79–93.
Erdianti, Ratri Novita. Hukum Perlindungan Anak Di Indonesia. Vol. 1. UMMPress, 2020.
Harahap, M Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, Dan Putusan Pengadilan. Sinar Grafika, 2017.
Jaya, Petrus Redy Partus. “Struktur Filsafat Dalam Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini: Perspektif Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan.” Researchgate. Net, June, 2024, 1–57.
Jufri, Mohammad, and Moh Basri. “Akibat Hukum Hukum Hak Asuh Anak Yang Tidak Dilaksanakan Pasca Perceraian Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif.” HUKAGI: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 1, no. 2 (2025): 112–30.
Octavia, Ratih Adzani. “Dualisme Hak Asuh Anak Pasca Perceraian Di Indonesia: Perspektif Kompilasi Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Perdata.” AFHAMUNA: Journal of Islamic Thought 1, no. 3 (2026): 245–53.
Salsabilla, Siti Noor Alieffa, and Siti Raudah. “Pemegang Hak Hadhanah Setelah Ibu: Kajian Fikih Dan Hukum Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory 4, no. 2 (2026): 2256–70.
Sastrawati, N. “Child Custody (Hashanah) Law Problems Due to Parents’ Divorce.” Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 26, no. Extra (2021). https://www.redalyc.org/journal/279/27966119029/.
Solichin, Nur Mifchan, and Diah Nuraini. “Analisis Pemenuhan Hak Anak Berdasarkan Fikih Ḥaḍānah.” IMTIYAZ: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman 9, no. 3 (2025): 459–72.
Sukmayanti, Made Sinthia. “Urgensi Pelatihan Khusus Bagi Penyidik Anak Dalam Penguatan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.” Jurnal Yustitia 21, no. 2 (2025): 93–104.
Wiraguna, Sidi Ahyar, and Maryanih. “Dinamika Asas Hakim Pasif Dalam Pembaruan Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia: Sebuah Telaah Doktrinal.” GOVERNANCE: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Politik Lokal Dan Pembangunan 12, no. 2 (2025): 67–68.
Yahya, A, R Rusli, and M Akbar. “Analysis of Judges’ Considerations in Deciding Child Care Case Against Apostate Wife.” International Journal of Contemporary Islamic Law and Society, 2021. https://jurnal.iainpalu.ac.id/index.php/ijcils.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 galuh permadi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
