FORMULASI SISTEM IMBAL HASIL DALAM KEUANGAN KONTEMPORER

Authors

  • Bayu Purnama Author
  • Sahrul Nurul Farid Author

Keywords:

Non-riba return, Currency value changes, Time period , Gharar, Islamic finance.

Abstract

The debate on the legitimacy of returns in contemporary Islamic finance remains largely dominated by a dichotomy between interest-based systems and profit-sharing schemes grounded in real business activities. Meanwhile, fluctuations in currency values and inflation have generated issues of value justice that are not fully accommodated within classical Islamic contractual frameworks. This study aims to formulate a non-riba return scheme based on time periods and changes in currency value, and to analyze its compatibility with the principles of fiqh al-muʿāmalāt. This research adopts a normative–conceptual approach using a library-based method, combined with descriptive–analytical analysis of the mathematical formulation of periodic payment schemes, deferred fund accumulation, and mechanisms for settling value differentials. The findings indicate that returns in the proposed model are not predetermined at the inception of the contract but depend on actual changes in currency value over the payment period. Time is positioned as a framework for the distribution and observation of value rather than as a basis for determining fixed additional gains. The study also formulates a surplus and deficit settlement mechanism in which value differentials are borne institutionally, thereby preventing the unilateral transfer of risk to customers. From the perspective of fiqh al-muʿāmalāt, this model does not constitute riba as it does not involve ziyādah muqaddarah (predetermined increment), nor does it contain maysir, as it is non-speculative in nature. Although an element of uncertainty (gharar) remains, such uncertainty is limited, measurable (gharar yasīr), and therefore tolerable within Islamic jurisprudence. This study concludes that a return scheme based on changes in currency value may be examined as a conceptual supporting mechanism for structuring agreements in Islamic contracts—particularly muḍārabah and mushārakah—without replacing them as primary contractual forms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Karim Aldohni. The Legal and Regulatory Aspects of Islamic Banking. London: Routledge, 2011.

Abdulkader Thomas. “Murabaha and the Economics of Islamic Banking.” Arab Law Quarterly 20, no. 4 (2006): 303–320.

Abdullah Saeed. Islamic Banking and Interest: A Study of the Prohibition of Riba. Leiden: Brill, 1996.

Adiwarman A. Karim. Bank Islam: Analisis Fiqih dan Keuangan. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2017.

Adiwarman A Karim. Ekonomi Mikro Islami. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2016.

Ascarya. Akad dan Produk Bank Syariah. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2017.

Azharsyah Ibrahim. “Gharar dalam Transaksi Keuangan Syariah.” Media Syariah 16, no. 1 (2014): 1–35.

Burhanuddin S. Hukum Kontrak Syariah. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2012.

Mahmoud A. El-Gamal. Islamic Finance: Law, Economics, and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

M. Umer Chapra. The Future of Economics: An Islamic Perspective. Leicester: Islamic Foundation, 2000.

Mohammad Hashim Kamali. “Gharar in Islamic Law: An Analysis.” Islamic Studies 35, no. 3 (1996): 297–312.

Muhammad Taqi Usmani. An Introduction to Islamic Finance. Karachi: Idaratul Ma’arif, 2002.

Nurul Huda, dkk. Keuangan Publik Islam: Pendekatan Teoretis dan Sejarah. Jakarta: Kencana, 2018.

Oni Sahroni dan Adiwarman A. Karim. Maqashid Bisnis dan Keuangan Islam. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2016.

Volker Nienhaus. “Risk Sharing and Risk Transfer in Islamic Finance.” Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance 6, no. 3 (2010): 1–18.

Zamir Iqbal dan Abbas Mirakhor. An Introduction to Islamic Finance: Theory and Practice. Singapore: Wiley, 2011.

Zaman, Asad. “The Centrality of Justice in Islamic Finance.” Review of Islamic Economics 15, no. 1 (2011): 1–18.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

FORMULASI SISTEM IMBAL HASIL DALAM KEUANGAN KONTEMPORER. (2026). JALLU LAW REVIEW, 1(2), 149-165. https://ejournal.jallunusantara.com/index.php/jallrev/article/view/13